Contact Try it now

← Back to blog

Production managementReading time 12 min

Why Production Dates Keep Slipping

A promised date is only as good as the capacity and dependencies behind it. Work through the queues, setup time and material constraints that make a simple schedule fail on the shop floor.

⇥

01Why lead time grows

A basic MRP schedule calculates the release date by subtracting a fixed lead time from the due date. But lead time changes as queues grow. If work in process increases, a plan based on yesterday's lead time can create even more lateness.

  1. Dates are unreliable → release material early as insurance
  2. WIP grows → queues lengthen → actual lead time grows
  3. Someone lengthens the lead time parameter in the system
  4. Material is released even earlier → more WIP → back to step 2

Little's Law links average work in process, throughput and lead time: WIP = throughput × lead time. It does not mean every delay can be fixed by cutting WIP alone, but it shows why releasing more jobs into a constrained system can lengthen queues.

02Find the bottleneck

  • An hour lost at the bottleneck is an hour lost by the whole plant, and it never comes back.
  • An hour saved anywhere else is not a saving, it just produces more WIP.
  • Which means: the bottleneck must not go down, must not make scrap, must not wait for material, and must have the fastest changeovers.
PositionStrategy
Before the bottleneckHold a buffer so it never starves
The bottleneck itselfRun around the clock, maintain it first, inspect upstream
After the bottleneckNo buffer needed, but never let downstream block its output
Protect the bottleneck from avoidable scrap and missing materials.

03Three scheduling approaches

MethodCore ideaWhere it fits
MRP (infinite capacity)Backs off the BOM and lead timesMaterial requirements planning; not for sequencing operations
APS (finite capacity)Accounts for real machine, labour and tooling availabilityDiscrete manufacturing with many machines and operations
DBR (drum-buffer-rope)The bottleneck sets the beat; release is tied to itLines with one clear bottleneck
CONWIPHolds total WIP at a fixed levelChanging product mix, where the bottleneck moves
KanbanPull replenishmentStable demand, repetitive production
CONWIP can suit changing product mixes, but the release limit must match actual capacity.

Drum-buffer-rope schedules releases to the bottleneck. The bottleneck sets the pace, a buffer protects it from upstream variation, and the release signal limits work entering the system. The goal is steadier flow, not simply fuller machines.

04Inputs a schedule needs

  1. Routings, which machine each operation runs on, in what order, with what alternates
  2. Standard times, run time and setup time kept as separate numbers
  3. Machine calendars, shifts, maintenance, holidays
  4. Tooling and fixtures, the second resource everyone forgets
  5. Operator skill matrix, not everyone can run every machine

05Where to start

  1. Find the real bottleneck, look at where WIP piles up, not at the utilization report
  2. Measure setup times and record them separately from run time
  3. Cap material release, set a WIP ceiling and stop releasing when it is hit
  4. Put a buffer ahead of the bottleneck and watch how fast it gets consumed
  5. Use SMED to cut changeover so small batches become viable